![]() Quiet and reserved, ISTPs tend to appear cool and aloof and are inclined toward shyness, except when with good friends. Because they are realists, they are able to capitalize well on available resources, which makes them practical, with a good sense of timing. They have a great respect for facts and can be veritable storehouses of information on the things they know well and understand. Curious and observant, ISTPs tend to be convinced only by hard, reliable facts. They tend to make logical and private decisions, stating things clearly and directly, just as they see them. ISTPs have an innate understanding of how mechanical things work and are usually skilled at using tools and working with their hands. Because they are analytical, ISTPs are most interested in the impersonal and underlying principles of things. They are unpretentious and often have a good understanding of the way things work. “ISTPs are straightforward, honest, and pragmatic people who prefer action to conversation. The following type description is excerpted from Do What You Are by Tieger, Barron, Tieger: Self-contained, casual observer, tinkering approach to problems, says Prominent personality characteristics: grounded, even-tempered, The ISTP comprises 4% of the population and is tied for the 9th largest group along with ENFJ. One of the two ‘introverted thinking types’, the other is INTP. ISTP’s shadow opposite or functional opposite =.The ISTP is an introvert (I) who likes to remain open (P). In case you’re curious about the thoughts behind the reblog redesign.ISTPs are defined by the functional stack: With the latest update, we wanted to open up discourse more: simply removing visual barriers allowed interesting, weird, and funny conversations from dying out before they even get rolling. The mechanic that fuels that-posts being literally passed from blog to blog-isn’t going anywhere. It’s a big part of the reason we’re all here. Ultimately, creative discourse is one of the things we love most about Tumblr. It also actually reduced the height of very long chains. It allowed us to include a little more interesting detail about the who-said-what, and give people as much space as possible to say anything they like. In the end, we combined our favorite parts of the two of these, hoisting the avatar and username up above the commentary. Not only did it further clarify who said what, but it gave people a better chance of being recognized for adding something thoughtful or funny to a conversation. Particularly on small screens, where space is already at a premium, we didn’t want to cut into space for creative responses with images, text, or literally whatever.Īt the same time, we played around with including avatars next to commentary. Trouble was, it meant that we were losing a tremendous amount of space for people to play with in the context of the reblog. Initially we tried preserving the indentation of the original design by insetting the stack in a frame. Simply listing the comments one after another was the first way it was done on the Plato Talkomatic, the grandfather of online chat, and it remains the clearest and easiest to read. So, how do you bring clarity to the reading experience while maintaining the constructive sensibility of reblog conversations? Turns out, a solution to this “who said what?” problem has existed since the creation of online chat. There are charms to that chaos, but ultimately it can make Tumblr hard to approach for new people, and leaves posts vulnerable to being consumed by their own popularity. Worse, deep conversations were being pushed completely off the post, effectively shutting them down. If you enjoy someone’s commentary midway down a deep reblog tree, you probably aren’t going to follow that thin gray line back to the top of the post to find out who said it. It eventually makes the whole thing tricky to figure out-especially in the mobile app, where most people use Tumblr. These blocks of content get smaller as the conversation grows, which in turn increases the distance between the names of the users and whatever they said. Old posts are rediscovered, already-weird posts get transcendentally weird.īut there were oddities with the way this commentary was presented. Transformative commentary in a reblog can completely change the meaning of a post. Good reblog commentary, in any context, sets off a whole new cycle of reblogging, sending a whole new set of conversations rolling around Tumblr, all of them picking up new comments as they go. You have to bring that post, wholesale, over to your own blog, before adding your piece to the bottom of it. You can’t just leave a comment on someone else’s post. Conversations on Tumblr aren’t like conversations anywhere else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |